Cool!  Sorry I didn't respond sooner, was down for the count for a few days
with a bug or something.

I've been in KY visiting family the past week and return to CA after the
new year.  Then I plan to focus on TDock as much as possible.

Ken

On Tuesday, December 22, 2015, Stephen Adolph <twospru...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ken,
> I bought a 2B today.  so I'm ready to go!
>
> I decided a 2B was a better investment then to use OpenWRT and a linksys
> router for my "laddiealpha on the WAN" project....
>
> Steve
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Ken Pettit <petti...@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','petti...@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> On 12/7/15 7:00 AM, Ray Lopez wrote:
>>
>> Ken, forgive the stupid question, but what does TDock do?  RL
>>
>>
>> Hi Ray,
>>
>> The goals of TDock:
>>
>> 1.  Provide an HDMI LCD video interface for Model T (a DVI replacement).
>> 2.  It should work with M100, T102, T200 and PC8201.
>> 3.  Provide a TPDD client to USB Thumb drives or SD cards (NADSBox
>> substitute).
>> 4.  Provide an interface capable of supporting networking.
>> 5.  Provide an interface for printing to modern printers.
>>
>> 6.  While not a goal, it also provides 13 I/O pins (well 11 I/O and 2
>> input only) on the pass-thru LPT port when not connected to a printer.
>>
>> The implementation in the picture is a daughter card for the Raspberry Pi
>> 2 B (a "Pi Hat").  It connects with the Model T parallel port for primary
>> communication of video data, but also has an RS-232 port (and a BCR port).
>> It also has a "pass-through" LPT connector where your old LPT printer can
>> be connected.  Making TDock a Pi Hat was the simplest and cheapest
>> approach, though it is not very portable and has the requirement of booting
>> / shutting down Linux.
>>
>> My other ideas involved simple microcontrollers or FPGAs to provide HDMI
>> / VGA.  They would have been more portable, but also more expensive.  The
>> general theme on this list always seems to be "cheap" (though I prefer the
>> word "inexpensive"), so I decided to give up portablily in favor of lower
>> cost.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>
>

Reply via email to