No plans yet. I suppose I could add it at some point but I need to make sure 
all the TPDD stuff is solid. It's looking good so far but lots of testing 
needed. The reason for going to Python was two create a version of mComm that 
people could tweak to their liking on various platforms. I'm in the process of 
downsizing for a move. I've already let go of my T200 and the TPDD2 and 
possibly the T102 will eventually go. I use my NEC units daily so those stay. 
I'd like to leave some clean code for the M100 community to work with and 
Python seemed to be a good way to do that. The Sardine stuff needs to be 
documented so others can fiddle with it. I'll continue to develop mComm but 
having an open source version will benefit everyone.

The TS-DOS delay issue is a problem. If it doesn't get a response fast enough 
it switches to 9600 baud and then it fails. There are a few options to get 
around this. NEWDOS has a delay you can adjust. In my user folder on Club100 
there are versions of TS-DOS and SARDOS that have delays built in. Those were 
developed when I created the Bluetooth capability in the Android version of 
mComm. 

Between John's Laddie Alpha and the Windows version of mComm you should find a 
solution that will work with your WiModem232

Kurt

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Joshua O'Keefe wrote:
>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Kurt McCullum <ku...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> Gary Weber (Of Web8201.net fame) had me modify the windows version of mComm 
>> to work with WiModem232.
> 
> Kurt, were you planning to bring the TCP functionality forward into your new 
> (Python, I think you said?) version of mComm? The potential for Sardine 
> compatibility from the living room sounds mighty tempting once I can try it 
> on my storage system.
> 
>> John said:
>> Here is my write-up regarding using Wimodem232 + NewDOS + LaddieAlpha
>> http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=Connecting_NEWDOS_to_Wimodem232 
> 
> Thanks John, this looks like fun. I'll try it when my WiModem gets here -- 
> the possibility of having LAN and WAN access to storage opens up a few more 
> daily driver use cases for me.
> 
> You said you ran into DTR issues, I wonder if the DTR checks can just be 
> NOPped out. I guess it's time for me to go learn to read 8085 while I wait 
> for my modem to get here.

Reply via email to