Interesting. I only have CloudT and T102 findings to report. It sounds like VirtualT emulates a M100, and I do have an M100, but the option ROM socket was *MANGLED* by its previous owner. Since I have a real ROM burned, I might try to fix the socket (or hardwire it in if it comes to it) and see how it performs on M100 hardware. Are the M100 and T102 fully ROM-compatible? As in they have the exact same libraries at the exact same memory locations, or are they different in some ways. I believe I remember some rumblings about how the ROM socket may have had a slightly different pin-out allowing for auto-start ROMs or something, but I'm not sure how far the other differences go. Maybe this really is an M100-only ROM? That would be a bummer.
—Justin > On Mar 18, 2023, at 12:45 AM, John R. Hogerhuis <jho...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 9:25 PM Stephen Adolph <twospru...@gmail.com > <mailto:twospru...@gmail.com>> wrote: > additionally, earlier tonight I DID get the same error message, using the > real ROM on real T102 hardware. > > AHAH! > Business Analyst ROM works on M100 only! > > Isn't that odd, wonder why. But, this appears to be confirmed in VirtualT as > well as on real hardware. > > Steve > > > > First theory would be some m100 ROM dependency on the opt-rom installation > code which differs by model. > > -- John.
