Thanks for the updates! I tried the following: 1. Flash REX# firmware via TPDD, which appeared to work but then exhibited the same behavior of trying to load some ghost image on start and then crashing 2. Flash REX# with the test.do, which I realize would lose the flash images but I've got backups. However this also crashes, though with some old-school panache, video here: https://photos.app.goo.gl/XfT9VQaVRBXG4HHM7
@Steve Thank you for the offer but I am pretty sure I have things backed up. If I don't have any luck doing the full reflash, I may drop you a line directly. This 102 is occasionally flakey, so once I'm back near another machine I will give it one more go and see if it's 102 specific or if I've bricked my poor rex. Thanks again, -Charlie On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:32 AM Brian K. White <b.kenyo...@gmail.com> wrote: > First thing verify the connection to all the pins in the socket. It's a > common weak point. No weak/compressed pins, no oxidization, rex# fully > seated etc. > > Otherwise what Steve said, run the install/update tool to reflash the Rex#. > > -- > bkw > On 5/25/23 21:27, Charlie Hoey wrote: > > Hello there! > > > > I had my first crash on a Rex# that I can't get myself out of, curious > > if anybody has any tips. > > > > I was in the process of creating a clean bank for a new project, and it > > failed somewhere near the end. I RESET and then ran `CALL 63012` to > > reload REX, but now whenever I start REXMGR, it attempts to load/write > > something and hangs. I've done a cold reset, pulled batteries etc, so I > > think it's in eeprom/flash somewhere. Here's a shot of what I'm seeing: > > > > Screen Shot 2023-05-25 at 9.13.23 PM.jpg > > If images don't work here, launching REXMGR shows the standard top line > > with "REX #2.1" in the top left, and the bottom right is the progress > > bar, which fills up most of the way and then hangs. > > > > Any way I might peek/poke my way back to a usable state? I don't care > > about the in progress job that failed, so if I could clear a flag or get > > it to just abandon it that would be fine. > > > > Thanks as always! > > -Charlie > > >