On 2 Mar 2004 at 13:11, Darren wrote:

> Hi Mike
> Who else would put me on to such a project of frustration?
> Version 2.2.10 includes the ethernet hack for sheepnet, haven't got 
> that far yet. Not found in 2.2.8 and below

Hi Darren
My favourite "test bed" on many an occasion + vice versa no doubt :)

> >>Using the rom-grabber from Basilisk on a beige mac produced a dodgy 
> >>rom image (it was never built for ppc's). The tool, CopyROM worked 
> >>well enough to get to a full desktop, unstable but workable. Speed is 
> >>a little slower than B2, not much.

Was about to try the ROM dumping utility "GetROM" [shipped with B2 
for win32] when I spied this in the  "GetROM" read-me file:

"Please remember to boot your Mac with extensions OFF before attempting
to dump the ROM image."

Did you try doing this 1st?

> > This is something I haven't tried [as yet]. How about the [Classic 
> > Mac] software ROM files for iMacs? Any use? I see them on iMac 
> > install/boot CD's. Or are they an extra, and still require the ROM in 
> > hardware?
> 
> I've tried the rom files from the 8.5 and 9.0 install cd's. The 
> emulation docs state a 4mb rom file is required, the files from these 
> two cd's are 1.8mb as is the rom update 1.6 found on version tracker 
> or cnet. When these files are used in sheepshaver both cd's will boot, 
> almost to desktop but the emulation will stop as a <ObjectLibSupport> 
> error is displayed with a reboot button.

Is that "ObjectLibSupportLib"? or "ObjectSupportLib"? - I'm thinking 
you're meaning the latter. If so, get rid of it if you can from OS 
8.x Extensions folder. It's not healthy to have around.

> The 7300 refuses to load a imac install cd but will load the rescue cd 
> which does have a 4mb rom file, 9.0.4 though. If you would be kind 
> enough to send me a 4mb 8.5 file I'd be grateful or one off a native 
> G3. ;)

"I Wish I Were..." extension of any use here? I have Systems 8.6 
loaded on a G3 at the moment, not 8.5 tho' or 9.x.

> I'll try it on mdk-ppc but I've already got a happily working MoL 
> install, it does suggest trying MoL's rom may work.
> MoL requires more direct access to the cpu and will not be ported to doze.

Be good to see how it progresses. Mac PPC emulation on Intel 
shouldn't be too far away [I hope] even low-end 603 mac emulation 
would be nice.

Now, I'd like to chat to u off list about my current Quake 1 woes if 
poss :)

Cheers, Mike.



-- 
Mac-N-DOS is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

    /      Buy books, CDs, videos, and more from Amazon.com     \
   / <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/lowendmac> \

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Mac-N-DOS list info:    <http://lowendmac.com/lists/mac-n-dos.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/mac-n-dos%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to