Last but not least (and this will be End Of Topic for me here ), we
don't have to regret what we did, because since first alpha
snapshot, we have :
- a very important and positive feedback
- a good list of issues to fix for beta ( maybe more)
By always using this argument, you show that you still haven't got
the point why I'm complaining...
SRC680_m220 aqua should be announced as "Preview 1" and we would get
the same feedback.
SRC680_m221 aqua could be announced as "Preview 2 done properly". And
again, we would get the same feedback.
Few days/weeks later, when prepared. And if you answer, that "it is
almost the same as preview 1 and 2 but way later", please spend your
time on making aquavcl02 Ready for QA instead of building, uploading
and whatever connected with the aquavcl02 snapshots...
But now I finally know who wanted to get something out even if not
finished in our CVS. And this also makes me really calm about the
timelines, because the timeline was used (together with mav_eric's
stupid "codename Neo" argument) as an argument to send something out,
if not finished/prepared correctly.
This is very bad and from now on, I'll be present on meetings even
when on vacation to prevent such misbehaviors.
--
Pavel Janík
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
