On Dec 1, 2013, at 2:50 PM, Lawrence Sica <lom...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Nov 30, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Carl Hoefs <newsli...@autonomy.caltech.edu> > wrote: > >> On Nov 29, 2013, at 7:51 PM, LuKreme <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 28 Nov 2013, at 18:48 , Michael <keybou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> back on a 32 MB 68040 machine, web browsing was relatively simple and easy. >>> >>> But it was all text and some images. No video. No dynamic content. No JSON. >> >> Come to think of it, I've never noticed any bloat from IE on Windows. Do >> they manage memory differently? > > Really? What version of IE? I’ve seen it eat lots of memory. Really all > browsers tend to do so I think.
I don't know about memory, but I recently learned that IE has been using a separate process per tab (as Chrome does) since IE8, years before Apple added it in Safari 7. Been meaning to post this link: <http://www.hanselman.com/blog/MicrosoftIE8AndGoogleChromeProcessesAreTheNewThreads.aspx> Back on the memory topic: if web sites are going to routinely leak massive amounts of memory, regardless of who's to blame, I'd like browsers to let me put a cap on how much memory each tab uses. Kind of like the old days of Classic Mac OS, when we could limit the amount of memory each application could use. --Andy _______________________________________________ MacOSX-talk mailing list MacOSX-talk@omnigroup.com http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk