> At $129 for a dot release? Not a chance. Maybe to go to 10.5. Think of 10.2 as really OS 11, I think Apple really mucked up the versioning for this, since they want to keep it OS _X_. Even in a marketing standpoint, the versioning scheme is dumb.
>From a CL and Unix goodies standpoint, it really doesn't make much difference, but anything that has a GUI has been enhanced with speed and aesthetics (Including Terminal) and the new iApps are very well designed. Justin Simoni -- + Freelance Web Design + Internet Application Development + Way Out There Artist [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://justinsimoni.com | 720.436.7701 > At $129 for a dot release? Not a chance. Maybe to go to 10.5. > > ..Mac is even more of a disappointment. At the same time that Apple is > pushing as hard as they ever have to get folks to switch, they are > treating their loyal installed base like crap. > > -Rich > > ellem wrote: > >> Because 10.2 and 10.1.x are different beasts I notice that some >> discussions need disclaimers like"but I haven't tried this on 10.1.4" >> and such so I am wondering.... >> >> Have you upgraded to 10.2? >> >> I have not, I am on 10.1.5. >> >> (And on a far less important note: Have you signed up for .Mac?) >> >> (Me either.) >> -- >> Lou Moran >> http://ellem.dyn.dhs.org:5281/resume/lmoran2002.html
