Agreed. Somtimes I overthink things and foget what the goal was in the first place. I'll install fink then use you oneliner to install image/perl magick. I'll let you know how it all goes.

Thanks again,

Mark

On Sep 22, 2004, at 3:31 PM, Chris Devers wrote:

On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Mark Wheeler wrote:

Ok... it seems to me that my two best options are as follows:

1. Install fink and then install ImagaMagick (as per below)
2. Install PerlMagick
3. Install the addition C libraries so as to have access to image manipulation
and compression and such

The third step automatically happens as a subset of the first here.

It can be done as a oneliner:

    fink install imagemagic perlmagick-pm581

(Though, of course, installing Fink is a separate step :-)

1. Install the Darwin port of ImageMagick.

I guess so; I know almost nothing about the Darwinports project. (I seem
to remember rumors about them replacing system commands like make & gcc,
so I was scared off from using it, but that may not actually be true.)


So with that being said, I guess the next question would be about the Darwin
port. How is that an advantage over fink (et al)? I know of darwin but don't
know anything about it. And finally, which would be the probable best route to
take -- fink or darwin?

Darwin is the kernel & base operating system for OSX -- if you're using
Perl on a Mac, you're using Darwin. Darwinports, on the other hand, is a
project that uses BSD tools to port Unix software to OSX, just as the
Fink project uses Debian Linux tools to port the same software.


I say use Fink, but it's subjective -- others will have perfectly valid
reasons for preferring Darwinports. I just happen to know & use Debian
far more often than I've ever used *BSD, so I'm more comfortable working
with that set of tools (apt-get, dpkg, etc). YMMV.


In any case, stop agonizing over it, pick one -- you can't really go
wrong either way -- and install the software you want & get going.

You're getting hung up on the least interesting part of programming! :-)



--
Chris Devers




Reply via email to