On Oct 5, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: > Given we're moving to ever longer checksums in our Portfiles, it seems best > to use the full sha. Hmm, you are right…
> BTW, what happens if there is a duplicate truncated sha? … which of course could happen, but with very low probability, I guess. ;) So, it's probably best if I revert my latest change. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
