On Saturday January 17 2015 12:02:26 Marko Käning wrote: > > I have a somewhat strong feeling against using the prefix for Qt > > applications. > +1 > > could be downloaded from the Nokia website, maybe a bit more), but I > > would never use something like qt5-gnuplot or qt5-wireshark. > +1
I'd prefer the Qt4 versions too O:^) Seriously, it'd be constructive to propose an alternative way of providing Qt4 and Qt5 versions of ports for applications that can be built atop either version (i.e. that don't provide an *optional* Qt-based backend, which would be provided through a variant). NB: wireshark apparently cannot be built against Qt 5 yet. R. _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
