> On Jan 22, 2015, at 22:35, Lawrence Velázquez <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 23, 2015, at 1:33 AM, Lawrence Velázquez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My last change dropped ld64 +universal to v127.2 > > Rather, it changed the version if a PowerPC build were requested in any way. > So that's probably even worse.
No, that's expected. If ppc is desirer, we should have 127.2. I think the best solution would probably be similar to the perl port. We should maybe have ld64-97, ld64-127, ld64-136, and ld64-latest subports and have the ld64 port depends_run on the subport that should be selected. The ld64 subports should all be simultaneously-installable and $prefix/bin/ld should be a symlink to the "preferred" one. That will also make it easier to bootstrap to use 136 to bootstrap 236 with Xcode 3.2. --Jeremy
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
