On Jan 23, 2015, at 2:16 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, that's expected. If ppc is desirer, we should have 127.2. Right. I meant "worse" in the sense of "more confusing", as far as the port itself goes. > I think the best solution would probably be similar to the perl port. We > should maybe have ld64-97, ld64-127, ld64-136, and ld64-latest subports and > have the ld64 port depends_run on the subport that should be selected. The > ld64 subports should all be simultaneously-installable and $prefix/bin/ld > should be a symlink to the "preferred" one. > > That will also make it easier to bootstrap to use 136 to bootstrap 236 with > Xcode 3.2. This sounds pretty good. vq _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
