Updated the ld64 port with this behavior.

I'm holding off on doing cctools like that since I'm hoping we can just make it 
the latest version everywhere.

> On Jan 23, 2015, at 11:10, Lawrence Velázquez <lar...@macports.org> wrote:
> 
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 2:16 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia 
> <jerem...@macports.org> wrote:
> 
>> No, that's expected.  If ppc is desirer, we should have 127.2.
> 
> Right. I meant "worse" in the sense of "more confusing", as far as the port 
> itself goes.
> 
>> I think the best solution would probably be similar to the perl port.  We 
>> should maybe have ld64-97, ld64-127, ld64-136, and ld64-latest subports and 
>> have the ld64 port depends_run on the subport that should be selected.  The 
>> ld64 subports should all be simultaneously-installable and $prefix/bin/ld 
>> should be a symlink to the "preferred" one.
>> 
>> That will also make it easier to bootstrap to use 136 to bootstrap 236 with 
>> Xcode 3.2.
> 
> This sounds pretty good.
> 
> vq
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to