> On 15 Jun 2022, at 3:25 pm, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Base is exactly smart enough. When supported_archs contains only 1 arch, it 
>> does make sense to offer a universal variant, therefore base prevents it.
>
> As I said before, supported_archs contains x86_64 and arm64.

what about configure.universal_archs though, have you set that to have > 1 
entry ? thats what base cares about, hence the "due to < 2 supported 
universal_archs

>
> If ports should be able to create a universal variant in case that variant 
> isn't created automatically, "base" should be polite enough to assume that 
> the port maintainers know and have a reason for what they're doing.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to