On 10/19/07, Lenore Horner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (No. Bottom posting is harder to read. The reader must scroll past > all the stuff already read to get to new content.) > You are supposed to remove the stuff that isn't relevant: bottom-posting provides context so a complex topic can be understood BEFORE commenting.
> Why isn't pear (is that the source of the perl5.8 ?) going to be > broken by having its version of the file overwritten with the one > gimp wants? The file should be the same, no? What would break? -- Paul Beard / www.paulbeard.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
