From E.T.'s Keyboard... Are We Alone in the Universe? ancient.ali...@icloud.com
On 6/29/2016 12:19 PM, David Griffith wrote:
I am personally disturbed because 1. I have never found a bluetooth headset loude enough for me as a severely deaf person. 2. I hate with a huge amount options which try to use my hearing aids as an alternative as the sound is also lousy 3. However I get perfect loud fidelity from a large range of cheap headsets including my £7.99 JVC Gumy earphones which are perfectly loud enough for me with my iPhone. They are for example far superior to the earphones provided with my SE - which are very quiet by comparison. I hate the fact that Apple wants to deny me the possibility of using my wired earphones and force me into unnecessarily expensive bluetooth options or alternatively buy another clumsy adaptor limiting the funtionality of my device. I have an iPhone SE for the moment but like others will probably be forced to switch to Android to maintain choice in this area. Apple are strangely arrogant in this respect. They obviously regard perfectly functional technology as old hat - they have never bent on allowing SD card storage for example. I notice that Samsung bent to consumer demand and reinstated the SD Card into their phones after consumer protest. I doubt whether Apple would listen in the same way somehow. David Griffiththe On 28/06/2016 12:19, Saqib Hussain wrote:Hi. Invested in a Sony Bluetooth Headset and the sound quality is great with plenty of base. They only cost me around £60. I would never go back to a wired headset again. I don’t like the idea of Apple implementing a an lightening connector for their next great invention for their EarPods because you can’t charge your phone at the same time unless they are going to bring out wireless charging phones.On 26 Jun 2016, at 23:55, E.T. <ancient.ali...@icloud.com> wrote: Cait, Better than any of that is uhm, the time before computers! From E.T.'s Keyboard... Are We Alone in the Universe? ancient.ali...@icloud.com On 6/26/2016 3:42 PM, Caitlyn Furness wrote:Exactly!! things change over time. does anybody remember 8 track tapes, or even just plain old cassettes?? How about those huge 5 and a half inch floppy disks? How about when all the memory you could get was something like 64 megs, and there really wasn’t any portable storage?? yep, progress is good! CaitOn Jun 26, 2016, at 6:24 PM, E.T. <ancient.ali...@icloud.com> wrote: Some members here may not go back far enough to the days of the many choices we had for headphones. Wired, wired, wired, wired, and wired. (smiles) I really do not get this concern over a possible change in hardware that no one has laid eyes on. But if it is true, its as good as carved in stone (the 7 is likely off the drawing board by now). And should I need (not want) a new phone, why, I have faith in Apple in its ability to provide what may be needed to satisfy connectivity concerns. From E.T.'s Keyboard... Are We Alone in the Universe? ancient.ali...@icloud.com On 6/26/2016 3:09 PM, erik burggraaf wrote:All this makes me very glad I'm an android user. Whether the demize of the 3.5 mm jack turns out to be a good thing long term or not, I myself am not ready to take that step. I can't even really go for bluetooth headphones which I'd really like to do because I need wired headphones for so many things besides my phone. The bank machine for example. I have to have bt headphones that give me the option of plugging in when I want to and those headsets are so bulky and so expensive that they really aren't useful as wireless headphones. So, I just bought a $100 android phone that does everything I would want to do with an Iphhone, doesn't have nearly as good a screen, but has much better battery life and sound system, figures to last me for two years or more, and let's me keep the audio jack. Best, Erik Burggraaf Visit the out of work bum for your chance to win one of 10 KNFB Reader or Nearby Explorer for IOS or android! http://www.theoutofworkbum.work Also check out my website for inclusion to the android platform for persons with sensery, physical or cognitive disabilities: http://www.inclusiveandroid.comOn Jun 25, 2016, at 6:39 PM, M. Taylor <mk...@ucla.edu <mailto:mk...@ucla.edu>> wrote: Hello Everyone, Here is an interesting article that I thought you'd like to read, the URL to which is located at the end of the text. NOTE: I edited out the 1 profane word that appears in the original text so as to bring this piece in compliance with our list policies. Enjoy, Mark Taking the headphone jack off phones is user-hostile and stupid, Have some dignity By Nilay Patel on June 21, 2016 Another day, another rumor that Apple is going to ditch the headphone jack on the next iPhone in favor of sending out audio over Lightning. Or another phone beats Apple to the punch by ditching the headphone jack in favor of passing out audio over USB-C. What exciting times for phones! We're so out of ideas that actively making them shittier and more user-hostile is the only innovation left. ditching the headphone jack on phones makes them worse Look, I know you're going to tell me that the traditional TRS headphone jack is a billion years old and prone to failure and that life is about progress and whatever else you need to repeat deliriously into your bed of old HTC extUSB dongles and insane magnetic Palm adapters to sleep at night. But just face facts: ditching the headphone jack on phones makes them worse, in extremely obvious ways. Let's count them! (Also, here is a list of reasons you might actually prefer Lightning headphones, by my friend Vlad Savov, but let's be clear that my list is the superior one.) 1. Digital audio means DRM audio Oh look, I won this argument in one shot. For years the entertainment industry has decried what they call the "analog loophole" of headphone jacks, and now we're making their dreams come true by closing it. Winter is coming Restricting audio output to a purely digital connection means that music publishers and streaming companies can start to insist on digital copyright enforcement mechanisms. We moved our video systems to HDMI and got HDCP, remember? Copyright enforcement technology never stops piracy and always hurts the people who most rely on legal fair use, but you can bet the music industry is going to start cracking down on "unauthorized" playback and recording devices anyway. We deal with DRM when it comes to video because we generally don't rewatch and take TV shows and movies with us, but you will rue the day Apple decided to make the iPhone another 1mm thinner the instant you get a "playback device not supported" message. Winter is coming. 2. Wireless headphones and speakers are fine, not great I am surrounded by wireless speaker systems. (I work at The Verge, after all.) And while they mostly work fine, sometimes they crackle out and fail. It sucks to share a wireless speaker among multiple devices. Bluetooth headphones require me to charge yet another battery. You haven't known pain until you've chosen to use Bluetooth audio in a car instead of an aux jack. Bluetooth: next year it'll work great. 3. Dongles are stupid, especially when they require other dongles Shut up, you say. All of your complaints will be handled by this charming $29 dongle that converts digital audio to a standard headphone jack! Have some dignity To which I will respond: here is a photo of Dieter Bohn and his beloved single-port MacBook, living his fullest #donglelife during our WWDC liveblog: Photo of macbook with a bunch of dongles Everything is going to be great when you want to use your expensive headphones and charge your phone at the same time. You are going to love everything about that situation. You are going to hold your 1mm thinner phone and sincerely believe that the small reduction in thickness is definitely worth carrying multiple additional dongles. Also, they're called [redacted] dongles. Let's not do this to ourselves. Have some dignity. 4. Ditching a deeply established standard will disproportionately impact accessibility The traditional headphone jack is a standard for a reason - it works. It works so well that an entire ecosystem of other kinds of devices has built up around it, and millions of people have access to compatible devices at every conceivable price point. The headphone jack might be less good on some metrics than Lightning or USB-C audio, but it is spectacularly better than anything else in the world at being accessible, enabling, open, and democratizing. A change that will cost every iPhone user at least $29 extra for a dongle (or more for new headphones) is not a change designed to benefit everyone. And you don't need to get rid of the headphone jack to make a phone waterproof; plenty of waterproof phones have shipped with headphone jacks already. 5. Making Android and iPhone headphones incompatible is so incredibly arrogant and stupid there's not even explanatory text under this one 6. No one is asking for this Raise your hand if the thing you wanted most from your next phone was either fewer ports or more dongles. I didn't think so. You wanted better battery life, didn't you? Everyone just wants better battery life. Original article at: http://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2016/6/21/11991302/iphone-no-headphon e-jack-user-hostile-stupid -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.-- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <mailto:macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com <mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.-- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. <Ancient_Aliens.vcf>-- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. <Ancient_Aliens.vcf>
-- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<<attachment: Ancient_Aliens.vcf>>
