I think this is part of a natural phase that various technologies go through. 
For stereos, you had Heath kits. For computers, you had interchangeable card. 
In this process, there's a shift toward "integration" in the hardware, which 
makes it difficult to tinker with. Even auto companies went through this 
process, till folks came up with the proper screw-drivers to work on them. 
Perkins Braillers have dedicated parts, but that doesn't keep people from 
tinkering with them. I think that for the people who can't resist tinkering, 
that spirit will prevail, especially given the challenge presented by 
non-standard technologies. Either that, or more savvy tekkies will simply buy 
devices that are easier to modify.

Teresa
On Jan 21, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Scott Ford wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
>       I have read the previous messages on this topic, I would like to
> respectfully object.  I would like to begin by saying that I feel the topic
> is certainly news worthy.  Furthermore I am quite disturbed at how readily
> folks on this list are willing to just bow to the "omnipotent Corporation
> looking out for our well being."  I feel that Apple is only protecting its
> bottom line and that is where it begins and ends.  Fifty years ago the Sears
> catalog included schematics so that one could self troubleshoot issues whit
> products that were sold in their catalog.  Today we have covers to cover
> covers, layering the electronics and mechanical parts of our cars and
> hundreds of other devices that we use every day.  As an American I love our
> traditional spirit of adventure and personal independence to take a product
> designed or meant for one purpose and transform it into something completely
> beyond what it was designed for.  In pushing this envelope we have been a
> market leader and produced some of the sharpest minds in our century.  I
> know for a fact that a few funky shaped screws are not going to stop the
> people that I am describing.  I am objecting with the status quo, and the
> consensus of the people on this list.  Before I went blind I was a Heavy
> equipment Mechanic.  Whenever I would hear about situations like the one
> outlined I would be frustrated.  We have an amazing amount of competent
> electronic specialists who would not bat an eye at removing the back of
> their iPhone to do a minor repair.  I am a ham radio operator and that
> spirit is certainly alive and flourishing.  The amount of money that folks
> with these skills are saving by doing their own repairs, are nothing short
> of amazing.  When I owned a computer store and we would frequently have
> computers come in where their capacitors had dried out and exploded.  This
> action is so dramatic, that when my friend and business partner who happened
> to be one of these skilled electronic technicians that you are saying have
> no business tinkering around in a iphone, would replace the capacitors.  Our
> customers would think that he had performed nothing short of a miracle.
> Along those same lines I had dropped my BN PK and the cards had become
> dislodged.  He simply reseated them and I went on my way.  The company had
> just charged me 250.00 for new batteries.  He researched it in four minutes
> and could have replaced them for me for 18.00.  How much do you think that
> Humanware would have charged for reseating my cards, not to mention the
> time.  Please do not tell me that this is not news worthy, because it
> certainly is.
> Sincerely,
> Scott      
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of heather kd5cbl
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:04 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Apple "screwing" iPhone users to block them from opening the
> hardware they paid for.
> 
> Well, that would be like watching tim the tool man tailor, right!
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ricardo Walker" <rwalker...@gmail.com>
> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Apple "screwing" iPhone users to block them from opening the 
> hardware they paid for.
> 
> 
> Lol,
> 
> I think this is quite funny.  Really, unless your the like 1% of iPhone 
> owners who want to take your device apart, is this even news worthy?
> 
> Ricardo Walker
> rwalker...@gmail.com
> Twitter, Skype, and AIM: rwalker296
> Google Voice: 1-646-450-2197
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 20, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Scott Howell wrote:
> 
>> Gee, have you considered that maybe Apple doesn't want you mucking about 
>> in there and then trying to claim the device has some sort of flaw, which 
>> means they would have to replace or repair it? There is a reason why they 
>> don't want the average person messing with the internals. Now once out of 
>> warranty, I think you should be able to do whatever you want since if you 
>> break it you get to keep the pieces or pay APple to put it back together.
>> Scott
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 20, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Sarah Alawami wrote:
>> 
>>> Is this another method apple i using to control repairs and keep 
>>> consumers out? read more:
>>> 
>>> http://bit.ly/gpoTpd
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to