If they would stop fighting like a couple of spoiled, bratty children, the 
problem would be solved as well.

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 24, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Eric Oyen <eric.o...@gmail.com> wrote:

> perhaps apple should break loose of some of their huge sums of spare cash and 
> simply buy out Samsung completely (its called a hostile takeover). that would 
> solve a number of problems all at once.
> 
> -eric
> 
> On Feb 24, 2013, at 7:57 PM, James Mannion wrote:
> 
>> In reading some further posts on the web, this is worse than I
>> thought. The only article I read earlier today lead me to believe it
>> was about the triple click home to start voiceover. IT is not. IT is
>> about the very heart of voiceover for us, its ability to read things
>> on the screen. An article points out that this is the case and that
>> Samsung is not even trying to protect their technology for
>> accessibility, they are simply using it as a weapon. So they are
>> completely putting us up as a sacrifice for their battles. One can
>> only hope the courts will see right through this and consider it
>> exactly what it is.
>> 
>> http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/02/german-court-stays-samsungs-voiceover.html
>> 
>> "one. Samsung didn't assert this German patent in an effort to protect
>> its investment
>> in accessibility. It elected to use an accessibility-related patent as
>> a tactical
>> weapon. Patent protection and enforcement can be justified in certain 
>> scenarios.
>> For example, if there are two companies competing in the market for
>> hearing aids,
>> it's generally legitimate for them to assert accessibility-related
>> patents against
>> each other. I would also support the idea of accessibility patent 
>> enforcement in
>> cases of willful infringement, and if Samsung had only requested
>> monetary compensation
>> in this action, it would have made a much better choice than by trying
>> to achieve,
>> through the pursuit of an injunction, the deactivation or (more
>> realistically) degradation
>> of the voiceover functionality Apple provides to its German customers.
>> In recent weeks I have been contacted by a couple of journalists who
>> report on and
>> care about accessibility issues. One of them told me he's blind. I
>> completely understand
>> why the vision-impaired are concerned when they hear about a lawsuit
>> like this one.
>> Maybe there's a cultural difference here between Asia and the Western
>> hemisphere.
>> In the United States and Europe, people may be more sensitive to this
>> type of issue
>> than in Korea. I don't think Samsung is evil. I really don't. But it should 
>> give
>> more thought to the wider implications of its retaliatory actions
>> against Apple."
>> 
>> On 2/24/13, James Mannion <mannion...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So incredibly ridiculous too. Block the sale of a product under the
>>> excuse that a comman is entered in the same way and then add to it the
>>> fact that it does not even control something that is equal in
>>> functionality either! There just aren't even words to describe it.
>>> This law suit flinging is worse than 5 year olds. At least they have
>>> an excuse for acting childish and they are more reasonable when they
>>> do. If you can't stand your competition, maybe you just don't make a
>>> worthy product to begin with. You know, one that would sell itself by
>>> the millions? If because of your competition your sales are less, your
>>> product sucks!
>>> 
>>> On 2/24/13, Jessica Moss <junglebookfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Join the club, not just for that reason, but the last time I bought one
>>>> of
>>>> their products, the Intrepid phone with Sprint, I had problem after
>>>> problem
>>>> with it.  It crashed repeatedly, when I did the slightest thing with it,
>>>> and
>>>> nobody at the Sprint stores I took it to could figure out what was wrong
>>>> with it, and continuously tried to blame the Mobile Speak software for it
>>>> crashing, which was upsetting to me.
>>>> So after about the 4th or 5th time it did this, and this was after I
>>>> had
>>>> to have help resetting it 2 days in a row, I just didn't reinstall Mobile
>>>> Speak again, and decided to pay full price for a 32 gb IPhone, sense I
>>>> unfortunately wasn't elegible for an upgrade yet, and wasn't willing to
>>>> wait
>>>> anymore.
>>>> So now my Intrepid is now one of Hannah's toys, and she loves to
>>>> pretend
>>>> to call her Granddad, and check her messages lol.
>>>> On Feb 24, 2013, at 8:47 PM, James Mannion wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I agree that I will not ever support Samsung either because of this.
>>>>> Nice how they do not really do anything that indicates any real
>>>>> interest in helping us to better use their products, but they are
>>>>> willing to cash us in as a sacrifice to attack the competition. This
>>>>> childish corrupt law suit stuff really, really needs to stop! Until
>>>>> this law suit I have not heard of anything from Samsung concerning
>>>>> voiceover or a screen reader of their creation that does anything
>>>>> wonderful for us at all. Yet such a law suit would indicate they have
>>>>> great concern for us as their customers, right? Yes maybe if it
>>>>> weren't nothing but corruption!
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2/24/13, Annie Skov Nielsen <annieskovniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I will of course sign.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I will also have to say, that I will never ever buy a samsung product
>>>>>> after
>>>>>> their trying to destroy something that is so important to me. I am
>>>>>> angry.
>>>>>> We
>>>>>> all ought to sign.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best regards Annie.
>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2013, at 10:22 AM, jshandr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Some of you may have already seen this. I know its been tweeted out. I
>>>>>>> posted a petition on Change .Org on Saturday. It is in reference to
>>>>>>> Samsung trying to block sale of Apple products in Germany. Yes, I know
>>>>>>> their is a temporary hold on the decision. I just want Samsung to know
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> attack on the blind community is a bad move. Not only financially, bug
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> PR reasons. It is your choice whether or not you want to sign. I'm
>>>>>>> including the link. Pass it around to your friends and family to sign.
>>>>>>> Thanks for the support.http://chn.ge/XTrva7
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Vest, J. p.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups
>>>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> Visit this group at
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups
>>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> Visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an
>>>>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to