Are you saying he reacted angrily? In some ways I wouldn't blame him.
On 26/06/12 5:25 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Thanks for wise words. What surprised me most, was INABT reaction to his loss - of course, I talk about unpleasant surprise - but, I don't want to do "bashing on already dead horse". /Estel On wto 26 cze 2012 08:41:42 CEST, Jed <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > You clearly didn't follow all the threads, this was discussed in-depth. > Everyone agreed they should be allowed to partake too. > Re-read the criteria, whoever was deemed to have made the biggest > contribution were to be granted a CA. > That did not EXCLUDE people who contributed through coding efforts. > Generally such efforts have the biggest impact & require far more > effort/skill/time. > So it's only logical that more of such contributors would win out over > other community contributors. > I was disappointed that I didn't win, but I know my contributions > haven't had anywhere near the impact that others on the list have had. > Have an honest look at yourself, can you honestly say the opposite? > I noticed INABT didn't make the cut, that was very surprising. > But the competition was so tight, there was always going to be some > deserving users who missed out. > > On 26/06/12 4:21 PM, claude bucher wrote: > > there is absolutely nothing to be amused about here > > and i'm not talking about Micheal's disappointment not getting a > > device, as much as it put his "hitting a brick wall" statement in a > > questionable light; wouldn't have minded keeping a brick i guess... > > > > what may frustrate Micheal (and others, most likely, even thought the > > CA winner list thread must already have debated this ad nauseam....) > > is the fact that several if not all members of the Council won a N950; > > a couple thoughts about this > > no matter what personal likes or dislikes one may have for each of the > > current Council member, they all made considerable contributions to the > > Community and their being in the Council is but the most recent one (!) > > what is maybe more questionable is that many of the CA devices were > > granted on base of... missed coding competition opportunities, to put > > it bluntly. > > is this what this community is all about? coding? > > if that's the case, Micheal's statement appears under a different light > > IF NOKIA decides to pull out of Maemo, more then coding is going to be > > needed to save the community... > > > > however this may be, nothing to be laughing about... > > > > On 26 June 2012 06:43, Jed <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > LOL.... > > > > > > On 26/06/12 2:25 PM, misterc wrote: > > > > can't help noticing that a couple weeks ago you applied for a N9 > > from > > the CA... > > would winning one have changed your opinion on the "no future" idea? > > > > On 26 June 2012 04:07, Michael Cronenworth [via maemo community > > mailing > > lists] <[hidden email] > > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=__node&node=7580208&i=0>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > maemo-community mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community > > > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-community mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community _______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
_______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
