whatever man, you finished whining yet.

On 26/06/12 5:44 PM, claude bucher wrote:
Piotr.,

don't mention it ;)

as to INABT...
Pierre Coubertin, the "father" of the modern olympic games once said...
«seeking record is as bad for the body as for the soul; it wears out the
body and cripples the soul.»
if a member of the Community was only seeking a device, he probably lost
"the soul", no?

On 26 June 2012 09:25, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    __

    Thanks for wise words.

    What surprised me most, was INABT reaction to his loss - of course,
    I talk about unpleasant surprise - but, I don't want to do "bashing
    on already dead horse".

    /Estel


    On wto 26 cze 2012 08:41:42 CEST, Jed <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

     > You clearly didn't follow all the threads, this was discussed
    in-depth.
     > Everyone agreed they should be allowed to partake too.
     > Re-read the criteria, whoever was deemed to have made the biggest
     > contribution were to be granted a CA.
     > That did not EXCLUDE people who contributed through coding efforts.
     > Generally such efforts have the biggest impact & require far more
     > effort/skill/time.
     > So it's only logical that more of such contributors would win out
    over
     > other community contributors.
     > I was disappointed that I didn't win, but I know my contributions
     > haven't had anywhere near the impact that others on the list have
    had.
     > Have an honest look at yourself, can you honestly say the opposite?
     > I noticed INABT didn't make the cut, that was very surprising.
     > But the competition was so tight, there was always going to be some
     > deserving users who missed out.
     >
     > On 26/06/12 4:21 PM, claude bucher wrote:
     > > there is absolutely nothing to be amused about here
     > > and i'm not talking about Micheal's disappointment not getting a
     > > device, as much as it put his "hitting a brick wall" statement
    in a
     > > questionable light; wouldn't have minded keeping a brick i
    guess...
     > >
     > > what may frustrate Micheal (and others, most likely, even
    thought the
     > > CA winner list thread must already have debated this ad
    nauseam....)
     > > is the fact that several if not all members of the Council won
    a N950;
     > > a couple thoughts about this
     > > no matter what personal likes or dislikes one may have for each
    of the
     > > current Council member, they all made considerable
    contributions to the
     > > Community and their being in the Council is but the most recent
    one (!)
     > > what is maybe more questionable is that many of the CA devices
    were
     > > granted on base of... missed coding competition opportunities,
    to put
     > > it bluntly.
     > > is this what this community is all about? coding?
     > > if that's the case, Micheal's statement appears under a
    different light
     > > IF NOKIA decides to pull out of Maemo, more then coding is
    going to be
     > > needed to save the community...
     > >
     > > however this may be, nothing to be laughing about...
     > >
     > > On 26 June 2012 06:43, Jed <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
     > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
     > >
     > > LOL....
     > >
     > >
     > > On 26/06/12 2:25 PM, misterc wrote:
     > >
     > > can't help noticing that a couple weeks ago you applied for a N9
     > > from
     > > the CA...
     > > would winning one have changed your opinion on the "no future"
    idea?
     > >
     > > On 26 June 2012 04:07, Michael Cronenworth [via maemo community
     > > mailing
     > > lists] <[hidden email]
     > > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=__node&node=7580208&i=0>>
     > >
     > > wrote:
     > >
     > >
     > >
     > >
     > > _______________________________________________
     > > maemo-community mailing list
     > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
     > > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
     > >
     >
     > _______________________________________________
     > maemo-community mailing list
     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
     > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community


    _______________________________________________
    maemo-community mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community




_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community


_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community

Reply via email to