On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 02:26:39PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:59:54 +0200, Quim Gil wrote: > > Now it's also a good moment to review the SDK and see what improvements > > can be made. The more pragmatic and specific you could be here, the > > better. > > Here are some specific things that I would like to see: > > 1. Free Software tools for creating a complete image to be flashed, > (that's called a fiasco image, right?) > > 2. A Free Software tool for flashing that image > > 3. An image built from only Free Software, that leads to as much > functionality as possible, (even if not all hardware components are > entirely functional) > > The above seem like pre-requisites before a self-sustaining community > could form around the device, (that is, a community that could trust > itself to continue to be able to play with the device in interesting > ways even after the manufacturer might lose interest in any specific > model). > > Of course, for any pieces that cannot be made available as Free > Software for whatever reason, it would be beneficial to know those > reasons. And it would be ideal to have sufficient documentation so > that the community could work on free replacements.
+1
Marius Gedminas
--
Funny, I never thought I'd find myself agreeing with a statement
containing both "lambda" and "more readable" ;^)
-- Casey Duncan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
