On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 16:20, Marius Vollmer <marius.voll...@nokia.com> wrote: > ext Andrew Flegg <and...@bleb.org> writes: > >> Although a unionfs solution would be a bit more further dev on Nokia's >> part, it will reduce the developer complexity and gives us a real >> world solution now. [...] > > Yes, agreed. Let's give this unionfs thing a shot. I was previously > arguing against it, but only as a long-term solution. As a > Fremantle-only hack, it might be better than the /opt hack.
Cool. I should also point out that when I say "a unionfs" solution, I mean "a union FS" solution; rather than advocating unionfs over aufs (for example). Thanks to Stskeeps/Carsten for picking me up on that. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:and...@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council chair _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
