El vie, 23-10-2009 a las 09:58 +0100, Aniello Del Sorbo escribió: > 2009/10/23 Cornelius Hald <h...@icandy.de>: > > On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 09:20 +0300, Kimmo Hämäläinen wrote: > >> On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 08:08 +0200, Hamalainen Kimmo (Nokia-D/Helsinki) > >> wrote: > >> ... > >> > Please, no threads, no! The screenshot is only taken if it does not > >> > exist, otherwise the existing screenshot is used. So, the performance > >> > penalty is not there every time, only when the old screenshot does not > >> > exist. > >> > >> I take this back... After checking the code, it seems the application > >> needs to check for the existing screenshot. What a disappointing > >> design... > > > > But at least it looks like all screenshots are deleted automatically > > once you switch themes. That's good :) > > > > Conny > > > So ok, to recap, the hildon_gtk_window_take_screenshot only sends a DBUS > message > to the window manager,
No; it sets a property in the XWindow. No dbus involved. Read my previous message. > I think the best would be to have a way to retrieve the screenshot path > so that we can check for it's existence before taking a new one (thus > we wouldn't be checking > it in a static path as we do now), instead of > hildon_gtk_window_take_screenshot checking for > its existence. That would add extra communication overhead. I insist that the best would be that the desktop itself checks whether the screenshot already exists. Claudio _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
