On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kees Jongenburger <kees.jongenbur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I disagree on most you say but do not on the Java part. Java would > IMHO given enough security, portability and ease of development in a > way that doesn't cost to much effort. the Current Maemo will already > be very hard to scale down(cost of hardware) that that is what you > need if you want to sell many devices. So we would make it run better on low-powered devices by slapping a virtual machine in between? Intuitively, that doesn't feel quite right. -- Ville M. Vainio http://tinyurl.com/vainio _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
