Attila, > Hate to be the bearer of bad news :( What we managed to agree for the PR1.2 release is that development releases starting with PR1.2 will not be called libqt4-maemo5 as it's not that obvious that it's *really* just a version for testing, prone to breakage and not necessarily the exact one that will end up in the next PR. Future releases will sport the 'experimental' moniker (f.e. libqt4-experimental, python-qt4-experimental) so it's more clear that it (and stuff depending on it) are not meant to be promoted to end users. Not ideal, but hopefully will reduce confusion until a better solution is found that is acceptable for both Nokia and the community.
I started this subject after reading the post by Venemo (http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=52442) so I decided that a good way to close it would be to add a post there (page 4). Having threads like that "out in the open" and "our" exchange of emails remind me of why I wanted the n900 so badly. It is a pretty unique device and even more unique community. I hope "we" can manage to make it more of a "mass market" product so nokia can justify maintaining it but, at the same time, I would hate to have to give in this "geek" feeling to it. Thanks again, Felipe _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
