On 25 December 2010 02:04, andre999 <and...@laposte.net> wrote: > [...]
> In my mind, it is triage and QA who would benefit the most from such a list. Not really, QA and Triage already use Sophie http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=irc#sophie > It seems if we were to have such a list, that it might be better to make it > a separate (web) application, which could be referred to in a separtate > tab/window, so it is charged only once for reviewing a number of bugs. > But if triage/QA is not interested, it is better to avoid this big list. > > Another thought : maybe we should have separate rpm and srpm fields. > Because end-users will relate more to ordinary rpm's, several of which could > be generated by the same srpm. > Do you think that would be useful ? > > my 2 cents :) > > André > > One field is enough, a package maintainer knows what rpms come from which of his SRPMs. The RPM Package field main goal is indicating where the bug exists as that's where it'll, hopefully, get fixed. -- Ahmad Samir