Op maandag 21 november 2011 01:00:35 schreef nicolas vigier: [...] > I'm not judging anyone. Just saying that "Core Release Source" is as > meaningless as "SRPMS/core/release" for someone who doesn't know media > policy.
oh, sorry, i seem to have misinterpreted it. well, that _is_ true. allthough i would argue that if people know media policy (because they can find that on the wiki), it would be different, _IF_ they are noobish enough not to really understand paths... (difference between acquiring information or acquiring a 'skill') [...] > > noone said anything about "multitple unique identifiers". be that as it > > may, from a user pov: if we have name + unique_id and GUI shows name, or > > we have name + description and GUI shows description is more or less the > > same if 1st name is similar to 2nd description. > > > > in short, if rpmdrake shows a short description instead of where name is > > now and name is mentioned of lesser importance, i'm ok with this. > > > > that would indeed make urpmi commands use path and rpmdrake still show > > (descriptive name/description) > > > > if that's what you mean, maybe you should've been more clear on this. > > then i'm sure even Stormi agrees... > > I don't understand what you're talking about ... ok, so much for clarity -_-' . in short: let rpmdrake show this short description (which looks more or less like the current name, but clearer) where the current name is now and i'm ok with this proposal.