On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 14:00:12 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 13:05:35 +0200 (CEST) Robert Vazan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > RV> I have been thinking about this and, if I want to make tests > reasonably > RV> fast and simple, there must be some way to deliver directly to > mailbox > RV> even if the mail is seemingly addressed to somebody on Internet. > > You can do this without problem if you have a Linux box on a LAN. Just > run > your own bind and put your own mail server as MX for the domain .M (which > doesn't exist AFAIK) -- then you should be able to receive anything sent > to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] back. Yes, but I realized this is going to cause problems in test scripts. > I still don't understand _why_ do you want to do this, however... It is useful to whitelist whole domain and there is no way to test it with single address. > RV> So what about adding "folder address" property that would cause mails > RV> matching address in that property to be delivered to folder for which > RV> this property is set? > > This would completely duplicate the filters functionality, wouldn't it? I meant to trap outgoing, not incoming, mail this way. Filters cannot do this or can they? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Mahogany-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers
