On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:06:08 +0200  Xavier Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> In theory... What do you think will happen if the guy on the other hand
> also uses a challenge/response system, and none of you know each other?

All outgoing messages are scanned and their recipients are added to
whitelist.

> Foo sends you a message.

And my address appears in his whitelist.

> You reply with a challenge.

Right up to this point.

> Foo's system sees
> this mail, and also replies with a challenge,

No, my challenge passes through, because I reply from whitelisted address.

> And if you let directly in messages with a special header that says
> 'this is a challenge', spammers *will* send you messages with such
> headers...

There is a password that is different for every address. It is possible to
make challenge harder than this, but I have never received reply from
spammer. Most, if not all, autoreplies generate mailer daemon errors that
are filtered into special mailbox.

> And what about the possibility for me to mail-bomb someone using a bunch
> of such auto-responders: I forge an email that looks like coming from
> Victim, and send it to a bunch of challenge protected addresses...

I archive autoreplied mail along with all MTA headers with IP addresses
and timestamps... The victim can mail me (after confirming my autoreply)
and I'll give him all information he needs.

> > People do confirm autoresponses and I am willing to reply to messages
> sent
> > by other people's autoresponders.
> 
> Why would you see them?

See above.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Mahogany-Developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mahogany-developers

Reply via email to