These patches dont conflict at all. They dont modify much of the mahout code per say. That do introduce new classes. I am more worried about oliver's changes. on his GIT hub.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Jake Mannix <jake.man...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I don't see evidence that new code comes in with nearly-correct style, > > nor efforts to correct style in existing code as part of patches -- am > > I missing this? So I'm missing the force that will make this happen, > > short of visible efforts like this, which are being resisted. AFAICT > > it's not going to happen then, and nobody thinks that's good. > > > > I take the point about long-lived patches, but right now we have none > > save perhaps Jake's that stand any chance of being committed. But > > > > Not true: Ted's SGD patch is going in 0.4, as is Zhendong's Pegasos > impl, MAHOUT-279, etc. Anything marked 0.4 has a patch. > > -jake >
