If its A. I have a few patches ready to commit like the static qualifier fix. I really need you guys to be on board on this. We just cant leave it at this discussion.
If its B. I will do the revert. But would have to patch some commits. If A sounds reasonable. Its easier to go forward than go back. I will not be making any more changes at this scale. except bunch of classes from time to time. Robin On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Robin Anil <robin.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I give up. This discussion is really getting to annoy me for some reason. >> >> :) Me too. I was doing this in good will, didnt mean to turn out this way. > If there is any work required in terms of cleaning up. I will be doing it in > the next couple of days. But that entirely depends on the course of action > > A. Current trunk works. Fix the issues with it and stick to the current > lucene code format > B. Revert to Feb12(few small line patches are in especially in utils) > which we can pick and repatch. And leave code as Is? And all of us try to > modify it incrementally to adhere to the lucene code format > > Time is precious as all agree. So choose. > > Robin >
