Yeah why don't I have a crack at this. The change as it stands is
already too big for what it is (though I believe they're good
changes.) Then we look at more changes, and sounds like there are
several ideas for streamlining vectors, which is a great thing to
think about at this early stage.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about this alternative:
>
> NamedVector: {Vector: wrapped, String: name}
> Vector: AbstractVector
> AbstractVector: DenseVector | SequentialSparseVector | HashSparseVector
>
> This avoids the multiplicative explosion of vector types.
>
