Ok this is a good concrete example, I like concrete. :) I'm still very wary of having to have some mapper or reducer classes deal with LabeledVector some deal with just Vector...
Maybe the right thing to do for now is keep the name in Vector directly, but fix the serialization which currently can't distinguish between "" and null properly. When we get avro in, maybe it will show the way to nicely handle this kind of typesafe way of dealing with optional data. -jake On Apr 18, 2010 10:23 AM, "Jeff Eastman" <j...@windwardsolutions.com> wrote: CanopyClusterer.emitPointToExistingCanopies emits clusterId :: VectorWritable On 4/18/10 10:07 AM, Jake Mannix wrote: > > In code we already have? > > -jake > > On Apr 18, 2...
