On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:24, Darrell Fuhriman wrote: > Maybe open up the code to a few more commiters would help? But, I > don't get the impression there's much interest in letting others > have a crack at it.
I agree that I am going to have to open the project up to more committers if Mailman 3 (or 2.2 or whatever) is going to make any serious progress. I will admit that I have had a hard time until now doing this, but I have been very happy with what Tokio's done for 2.1.6, so I'm willing to start thinking about expanding access. > I'd really like to see some serious discussion about the > architecture of mailman3, so we can get coding. Yes, but not here. There is a mailman3-dev mailing list for this. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=show&file=faq01.027.htp
