SM writes: > Hi Stephen, > At 23:28 05-05-2014, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > >Don't you have that backwards? It's pointing out lack of a formal > >hard requirement that is nit-picking. After all, Postel's Principle > >isn't written in any IETF procedure manual. Would you call that one a > >"nit", too? > > I labelled my previous comment as a nit (the previous comment was > unimportant). I would not describe anything someone else writes as a nit.
OK, thanks for the apology. And sorry on my part for assuming you were calling the (informal) rule a nit. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
