Note: subject adjusted to reality. Barry Warsaw writes: > On Dec 05, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > >So /opt/mailman looks really good to me. > > +1 > > Distro packagers will probably make different decisions, but that's okay too.
Of course! After all we don't have to deal with actually doing it. ;-) (Presented company *not* excepted IIRC? I hope?! Wouldn't want to impose extra work on Our FLUFLous Leader!!!) > If there's anything in our configs that don't allow installation to > /opt/mailman and traditional locations, then that's a bug! Indeed. But surely it's not terribly hard to allow both kinds of installation if we just avoid hard-coded references (including relative references) to config and data files. _______________________________________________ Mailman-Developers mailing list Mailman-Developers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-developers%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-developers/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
