on 2/14/09 7:32 PM, Grant Taylor said:
Agreed. However I believe the permanent or temporary nature that the bounce is speaking of is on the SMTP level, thus the sending server should not try to send this given message again. I think it is a flaw to extend this SMTP meaning up to actual future (different) message delivery.
This is an excellent point. I don't think I could have said it better myself.
-- Brad Knowles <b...@shub-internet.org> If you like Jazz/R&B guitar, check out LinkedIn Profile: my friend bigsbytracks on YouTube at <http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu> http://preview.tinyurl.com/bigsbytracks ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9