* Brad Knowles <b...@shub-internet.org>: > On Feb 20, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > > As I said, I think it would just be the config.pck. Everything > > else is open source software, but I don't think I want it. It's > > not that I'm not curious because I definitely am, but I don't want > > to accidentally send mail to any of the list members. > > Another test would be to break up the large list into a number of > smaller sub-lists with an umbrella list. That would allow Mailman > to have a lot more internal parallelism, and not get into lock > synchronization issues over config.pck. You could also run multiple > sets of qrunners, if you split things correctly according to the > "powers of 2" rule.
What is a "smaller sub-list"? The list in question does only hold 11k recipients, which is not exactly large. Some off my SVN announce lists are much larger. Stefan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/ Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org