On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 16:10 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users writes: > > > See Stephens previous comments about how there was no way he could > > or would work with anyone working on mm2 because it was against his > > objectives, > > Correction: I will not work with someone who repeatedly misrepresents my > positions in the way that the quoted passage does.
Fine. I'll leave it up to the reader to bisect what you and I have both said on the issue, including your other comments today about how you (a member of the Mailman Cabal) will only support Mark's Mailman releases. I personally think that you, Stephen, are digging high and low to find any reason for Mailman2 to not continue forward under the Mailman umbrella. Obstruction much? I'd use the new MM3 archive of this list to link to your posts, but interacting with it is an abysmal time waste. At a minimum someone should put Brian's HK replacement on python.org? -Jim P. ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/ https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/
