(apologies in advance if this ends up a double-post)

Hello everyone,

I am the postmaster for magisto, an app centered around user generated content
(UGC). we enjoy some popularity, and with popularity comes abuse. There are
users who utilize magisto to generate content to be used for
spamvertisement and/or other unsavory content. they will then "invite"
users to see this content, in an unsolicited fashion, using the
built-in content
invite mechanism.

even if they incorporate it outside the invite mechanism, magisto still
serves as a "hosting server" for their content.

Ideally, internal user reporting would be sufficient to combat it, but in
reality it isn't: both because users submit many false reports and because
such a system doesn't scale.

DMARC can't help with regards - the messages are either entirely 'valid'
invite messages, or otherwise do not involve our domain.
FBL data can help, to an extent - but is again not relevant for the second
use case or for users spamming a provider which has no FBL offered, or
gmail who provide aggregate data only.
Spamtrap data is generally out of reach for us - so I can't estimate its
suitability to hunt these down. I suspect it will help somewhat, but not by
much.
Services such as spamcop will not provide data to us, for the concern that
we may listwash since we are not netblock owners. but again this will only
give partial coverage.
outbound mail filters are also at a loss to detect these, as the spam part
is in the destination page and specifically is a video in the case of magisto.
they also don't apply to the second use case.

in short - recommendations are most welcome, reference to best practices or
case studies from applicable examples. it's even hard to map properly, but
I suspect it's happening already as i'm seeing a tad higher rejection rate on
invites to watch content.

Regards,

Gil Bahat,
Devops/Postmaster,
Magisto Ltd.
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to