> On Oct 15, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Jay Hennigan <mailop-l...@keycodes.com> wrote:
> 
> I've been getting an increasing amount of spam to various of my addresses 
> some of which have not been been actively used for some time. The amount of 
> spam received is kicking upward fairly rapidly.
> 
> All of this spam is sent by a third-party, not the company whose primary 
> domain appears in the "From".
> 
> The content of this spam seems to be somewhat related to my interests in most 
> cases but definitely not from anyone from whom I've given permission.
> 
> In investigating this third-party mailer I came across this interesting 
> policy:
> 
>  "Unsolicited Email" is defined as email sent to persons other than:
>  (i) persons with whom you have an existing business relationship, OR
>  (ii) persons who have consented to the receipt of such email,
>  including publishing or providing their email address in a manner
>  from which consent to receive email of the type transmitted may be
>  reasonably implied.
> 
> It's section (ii) that concerns me. Scraping addresses from Usenet, blogs, 
> comments, or subscribed discussion lists could easily fall under 
> "Publishing", could it not?
> 
> What is the opinion of this group, is this policy that of a legitimate ESP or 
> a garden-variety spammer?

There's no way to tell just from that policy. If I put up a web page with a pr@ 
address and state that I'm interested in press releases in a given field then 
(arguably relevant) press releases sent to that address are not unsolicited. 
It's a reasonable policy. How it's interpreted and enforced makes the 
difference.

What response you get from the third-party mailer is more telling. If you're 
getting significant volumes of unwanted email from multiple customers of that 
ESP, then they're probably either incompetent or spam-friendly. If you're 
getting significant volumes from one or two customers of that ESP, *and you've 
not told abuse@ about it*, then it's possible they're a perfectly competent, 
reasonable ESP and have a couple of customers with just slightly crappy list 
acquisition practices.

If it's the ESP I think it is, they're a legitimate ESP with a reasonably 
responsive abuse desk but don't have the squeakiest cleanest customer base.

Cheers,
  Steve

> 
> --
> Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net
> Impulse Internet Service  -  http://www.impulse.net/
> Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop


_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to