On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Jim Popovitch <jim...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:46 PM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: >>>> IMHO, Mailman should strip the existing DKIM header and Mailop.org should >>>> sign anew. >>> >>>Yes! That is the perfect and proper way, despite some rants by less >>>experienced mailinglist operators. >> >> Hi. I've been running mailing lists since the late 1970s and having >> actually read the DKIM specs and written a fair amount of DKIM code, I >> know that stripping signatures makes no difference unless someone's >> mail filters are breathtakingly broken. > > But leaving the DKIM signatures provides what actual value with modern > MLMs (i.e. not .forward files, etc.) ?
I'm going to say it's an irrelevant question, because even just the headers that I excerpted in the thread are enough to suggest that John and Google might disagree on what constitutes broken. Regards, Al -- Al Iverson www.aliverson.com (312)725-0130 _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
