In fact, these providers offer OAUTH2 to allow you to send as using their infrastructure, and if you have bigger needs, many domains are going cheap at the moment...
Not ideal, but some options... On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Steve Atkins <st...@blighty.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 23, 2016, at 3:16 PM, Joel Beckham <j...@bombbomb.com> wrote: > > > > > > It's likely that ARC will become the new - much better - workaround > eventually, modulo the inevitable deployment issues. http://arc-spec.org > > > > I thought that ARC doesn't help with the ESP use case, or am I missing > something there? > > Probably not, no. The long term answer there is probably much the same as > the short term one - declining to send mail "from" users of those consumer > ISPs who've published p=reject records, and encouraging them to get an > email address elsewhere (whether that be an email address controlled by the > ESP or one from a more appropriate mailbox provider). > > Cheers, > Steve > > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop