DMARC looks ok: https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-inspector/chinalovecupid.com
Sometimes it takes more than 24 hours, also make sure the mail system does not flag the report as spam (because containing bad IPs)... On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > I see it slightly differently: > > > > $ host -t txt _dmarc.chinalovecupid.com > > _dmarc.chinalovecupid.com descriptive text "v=DMARC1\; p=none\; > rua=mailto:dm...@chinalovecupid.com"; > > > > What’s with the “\” in front of the “;”’s? > > > > Aloha, > > Michael. > > -- > > *Michael J Wise* | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has > Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool > <http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ? > > > > *From:* Dickie LaFlamme [mailto:rlafla...@dyn.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 6:02 PM > *To:* Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> > *Cc:* mailop@mailop.org > *Subject:* Re: [mailop] DMARC record in p=none not receiving aggregate > reports to RUA > > > > ha, no worries. That's fair enough. Here's the customers DMARC record. > > The domain > > : > > chinalovecupid.com > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fchinalovecupid.com&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=hyC4gIkrzZR%2fDciqYLZ9KKBH3Cn5dzc312xNuzjA%2bFw%3d> > > v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dm...@chinalovecupid.com > > > > Again we know that this does not currently have the "pct=100" tag, but > with or without the results have been the same. > > > > > Thanks, > > [image: Image removed by sender. Dyn logo, Dyn.com] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdyn.com%2f&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=snizrDv1dW5hmDG2c9T0AFXFSYYwshvzaTPVGR0n%2fQk%3d> > [image: Image removed by sender.] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=3EQ%2fAJ8dZSiczQ99YMEiW%2bMlIfg0hmjFI5gqYrLqkzU%3d> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyninc&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=gd8AkMpjOzvm5fw5NQtPSjuOBLoaIQ5oJQ5HScljMdw%3d>[image: > Image removed by sender. Dyn facebook account] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ffacebook.com%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=fZ3itHieFSAy2R0ac4ZmmKaj0aC9tkgy0EmdDdWsZeU%3d> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyninc&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=gd8AkMpjOzvm5fw5NQtPSjuOBLoaIQ5oJQ5HScljMdw%3d>[image: > Image removed by sender. Dyn LinkedIn account] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2flinkedin.com%2fcompany%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=%2fZMbTTscSw7Vrb7kDqCgNmr2V1FkMmESxbmFKoiuHhg%3d> > > Dickie LaFlamme / Deliverability Specialist > [image: Image removed by sender.] +1 603-296-1952 > > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > > … as always, please let us know the customer’s real domain name (or IP > address, or whatever) when making these requests. > > > > Not including that is about on par with the legendary complaints of: > > > > “ It Doesn’t Work. > > “ I Can’t Print. > > Etc, > > > > At some point, we’re going to ask you for it anyway, so best to just > provide it at the start. > > > > Aloha, > > Michael. > > -- > > *Michael J Wise* | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has > Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.microsoft.com%2fen-us%2fdownload%2fdetails.aspx%3fid%3d18275&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=FlP3r9KMf2HXfwj7n2SWZiwigROZBT2qGf4Tugx2Uds%3d> > ? > > > > *From:* mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] *On Behalf Of *Dickie > LaFlamme > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:28 PM > *To:* mailop@mailop.org > *Subject:* [mailop] DMARC record in p=none not receiving aggregate > reports to RUA > > > > We have a customer who's setup a DMARC record with the correct TXT record; > v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@"customerspostmaster"; after > waiting the 24 hour period we still did not receive any aggregate reports > to the mailbox. After some searching we advised the customer to try and > take out "PCT" as that could possibly have been triggering something to not > work correctly (shot in the dark try). > > > > Then after that attempt and no result I did some more research and found > that in some instances reports can be huge and up to 10MB and denied by > their internal servers. We then advised the customer to check their logs to > make sure mail wasn't getting denied at their gateway. To no avail reports > still are not being sent. > > > > Has anyone else run into this problem with customers when they're trying > to receive aggregate reporting using a rua that is in house? If so I'd love > to hear any troubleshooting you've tried as well as possible fixes for > this. > > > > Thanks, > > Dickie LaFlamme > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
