I checked my system, cannot see any report being generated. So may be this domain name is not in the RFC5322.From ?
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> wrote: > DMARC is not something I'm well-versed in, but was trying to do what tests > I could. Would be interesting to see what would happen if someone > deliberately tried to send from a non-SPF valid IP. > > Normally, it just sorta works, but I've never actually seen the traffic it > generates, or seen the software that is supposed to send it, so I'm unsure > exactly how to poke it with a stick... :( > > Aloha, > Michael. > -- > Sent from my Windows Phone > ------------------------------ > From: Dickie LaFlamme <rlafla...@dyn.com> > Sent: 4/14/2016 5:55 AM > To: Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> > > Cc: mailop@mailop.org > Subject: Re: [mailop] DMARC record in p=none not receiving aggregate > reports to RUA > > My bad, I should have included this issue has spanned well over multiple > days so the 24 hours rule wasn't a cause. > > I queued a few different customers I know with valid DMARC records and I'm > seeing the “\” in front of the “;”’s. > > I will however dig into the greylisting. As always, thank you all for > looking into this and helping out! > > Thanks, > > [image: Dyn logo, Dyn.com] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdyn.com%2f&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7c4a5fd44dcbe347ee0d5f08d36464199a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=9BSgzaNWDGgPxSITHebCgnG%2f%2bzmwJrbd9OvZAfp%2fLuo%3d> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7c4a5fd44dcbe347ee0d5f08d36464199a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=iNW1wPjNcDEkAyXLN6OQ9zv7MTgBTff%2fh22VMfI5duM%3d> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyninc&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7c4a5fd44dcbe347ee0d5f08d36464199a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=xUhxF0kd2YXPUrgPqMK9t3EnkqS%2fNRqlgOLWquT%2f6gc%3d>[image: > Dyn facebook account] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ffacebook.com%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7c4a5fd44dcbe347ee0d5f08d36464199a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=ZJsJdDiJ%2fpEUizQaQST%2fr21VTcwNrwoapKIIcrcbFBI%3d> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyninc&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7c4a5fd44dcbe347ee0d5f08d36464199a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=xUhxF0kd2YXPUrgPqMK9t3EnkqS%2fNRqlgOLWquT%2f6gc%3d>[image: > Dyn LinkedIn account] > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2flinkedin.com%2fcompany%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7c4a5fd44dcbe347ee0d5f08d36464199a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=6Flodk6OeXkOqEMnVVypjOZ90%2fBtC%2blpzokkkInA8UI%3d> > > Dickie LaFlamme / Deliverability Specialist > +1 603-296-1952 > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:22 PM, Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> I see it slightly differently: >> >> >> >> $ host -t txt _dmarc.chinalovecupid.com >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdmarc.chinalovecupid.com&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7c4a5fd44dcbe347ee0d5f08d36464199a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=4p809FBj2ADK844OD74sclb52Pn3Nyu%2fmLA%2fM8MnFCQ%3d> >> >> _dmarc.chinalovecupid.com >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdmarc.chinalovecupid.com&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7c4a5fd44dcbe347ee0d5f08d36464199a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=4p809FBj2ADK844OD74sclb52Pn3Nyu%2fmLA%2fM8MnFCQ%3d> >> descriptive text "v=DMARC1\; p=none\; rua=mailto:dm...@chinalovecupid.com >> " >> >> >> >> What’s with the “\” in front of the “;”’s? >> >> >> >> Aloha, >> >> Michael. >> >> -- >> >> *Michael J Wise* | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has >> Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.microsoft.com%2fen-us%2fdownload%2fdetails.aspx%3fid%3d18275&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7c4a5fd44dcbe347ee0d5f08d36464199a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=8XEh36oYSsYquP055DRdgwjdM%2bVOWgtSLTZfBUpqLVA%3d> >> ? >> >> >> >> *From:* Dickie LaFlamme [mailto:rlafla...@dyn.com] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 6:02 PM >> *To:* Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> >> *Cc:* mailop@mailop.org >> *Subject:* Re: [mailop] DMARC record in p=none not receiving aggregate >> reports to RUA >> >> >> >> ha, no worries. That's fair enough. Here's the customers DMARC record. >> >> The domain >> >> : >> >> chinalovecupid.com >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fchinalovecupid.com&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=hyC4gIkrzZR%2fDciqYLZ9KKBH3Cn5dzc312xNuzjA%2bFw%3d> >> >> v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dm...@chinalovecupid.com >> >> >> >> Again we know that this does not currently have the "pct=100" tag, but >> with or without the results have been the same. >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> [image: Image removed by sender. Dyn logo, Dyn.com] >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdyn.com%2f&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=snizrDv1dW5hmDG2c9T0AFXFSYYwshvzaTPVGR0n%2fQk%3d> >> [image: Image removed by sender.] >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=3EQ%2fAJ8dZSiczQ99YMEiW%2bMlIfg0hmjFI5gqYrLqkzU%3d> >> >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyninc&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=gd8AkMpjOzvm5fw5NQtPSjuOBLoaIQ5oJQ5HScljMdw%3d>[image: >> Image removed by sender. Dyn facebook account] >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ffacebook.com%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=fZ3itHieFSAy2R0ac4ZmmKaj0aC9tkgy0EmdDdWsZeU%3d> >> >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftwitter.com%2fdyninc&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=gd8AkMpjOzvm5fw5NQtPSjuOBLoaIQ5oJQ5HScljMdw%3d>[image: >> Image removed by sender. Dyn LinkedIn account] >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2flinkedin.com%2fcompany%2fdyn&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=%2fZMbTTscSw7Vrb7kDqCgNmr2V1FkMmESxbmFKoiuHhg%3d> >> >> Dickie LaFlamme / Deliverability Specialist >> [image: Image removed by sender.] +1 603-296-1952 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> … as always, please let us know the customer’s real domain name (or IP >> address, or whatever) when making these requests. >> >> >> >> Not including that is about on par with the legendary complaints of: >> >> >> >> “ It Doesn’t Work. >> >> “ I Can’t Print. >> >> Etc, >> >> >> >> At some point, we’re going to ask you for it anyway, so best to just >> provide it at the start. >> >> >> >> Aloha, >> >> Michael. >> >> -- >> >> *Michael J Wise* | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has >> Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.microsoft.com%2fen-us%2fdownload%2fdetails.aspx%3fid%3d18275&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7cd7b242b340c04fac17ec08d36400700d%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=FlP3r9KMf2HXfwj7n2SWZiwigROZBT2qGf4Tugx2Uds%3d> >> ? >> >> >> >> *From:* mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] *On Behalf Of *Dickie >> LaFlamme >> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:28 PM >> *To:* mailop@mailop.org >> *Subject:* [mailop] DMARC record in p=none not receiving aggregate >> reports to RUA >> >> >> >> We have a customer who's setup a DMARC record with the correct TXT >> record; v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; rua=mailto:dmarc@"customerspostmaster"; >> after waiting the 24 hour period we still did not receive any aggregate >> reports to the mailbox. After some searching we advised the customer to try >> and take out "PCT" as that could possibly have been triggering something to >> not work correctly (shot in the dark try). >> >> >> >> Then after that attempt and no result I did some more research and found >> that in some instances reports can be huge and up to 10MB and denied by >> their internal servers. We then advised the customer to check their logs to >> make sure mail wasn't getting denied at their gateway. To no avail reports >> still are not being sent. >> >> >> >> Has anyone else run into this problem with customers when they're trying >> to receive aggregate reporting using a rua that is in house? If so I'd love >> to hear any troubleshooting you've tried as well as possible fixes for >> this. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dickie LaFlamme >> >> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
