People assume click tracking, at the least. It's not clear that it would help, anyways, the point of these attacks is use them against another service, you might get some feedback but probably not fast enough to matter, just like the per user dkim selector.
Brandon On Aug 15, 2016 9:22 AM, "Tim Starr" <timstar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see your point, but why is it so bad to rewrite content links? I am > assuming a unique link per mailbox. > > -Tim > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Bill Cole <mailop-20160228@billmail. > scconsult.com> wrote: > >> On 12 Aug 2016, at 19:12, Tim Starr wrote: >> >> The only benefit I can see from sending the exact same message from >>> somewhere else would be to drive recipients to the same payload link, >>> which >>> suggests another possible way to stop this from paying off after >>> detection: >>> Make it so that all content links get turned into redirects you control, >>> and can break upon request afterwards if needed. >>> >> >> That works for a broadcast ESP but is a complete non-starter for a >> mailbox provider like Fastmail. Screwing around with message content to >> hijack links in nominally one-to-one email is just plain wrong. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mailop mailing list >> mailop@mailop.org >> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop >> > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop > >
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
