On 02/09/16 18:35, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Renaud Allard via mailop <mailop@mailop.org <mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote: On 09/02/2016 10:28 AM, Brandon Long via mailop wrote: > The spam team would love to send all unauthed mail to the spam label or > even reject it (they call it no auth no entry). > IMHO, that would be a good idea. If one big player does it, no-one can ignore it, so this enables the others to do it. On that note, wouldn't that just 'move the problem'? If we waved our magic wands and made all e-mail require SPF, DKIM, and DMARC or it goes to junk, a mail server compromise would lead to a bunch of spam that was SPF-allowed, DKIM-signed, and DMARC-policy-acceptable. And we'd still have spam in our inbox. ;)
Yes, but that limits the problem as the compromised server is easier to detect and block.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
