Hello, On 07/10/2017 07:53 AM, Dom Latter wrote: > On 10/07/17 11:22, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >> Back during the old nanae and spam-l days in the 90s and 2000s, >> whenever this came up, and it did a lot even with filters a lot less >> hair trigger than what we have today, the usual analogy wasn't people >> partying next door, it was usually compared to renting an apartment >> in a high crime area so cabbies and pizza delivery people wouldn't go >> there after dark, or most any time for that matter: > > We have been in the Hetzner "neighbourhood" for years. This is our > fourth server (and hence IP address) there and the first time we have > had this issue. [1] > > But it shouldn't matter. We are not spammers. It is stupid to block > a range of IP addresses on the behaviour of one. And there should be > some sort of checker / delisting mechanism that is better than writing > to postmaster@ and hoping for the best.
It's not just one, it's many. Yes, there ought to be a path to delist that's reasonable. > > [1] We have relatively unusual requirements - we need *lots* of disk > space (we upload 2TB / year, and it's nice to have a few years worth) > but other than that a fairly modest server will suffice. It would be > nice to find a UK provider with, say, 4 x 4TB disk, for < 100USD / yr. Unfortunately, in this case you get what you pay for. A Ford Focus is not a Rolls Royce and can't be expected to ride like one, even if you're a good driver who follows the rules of the road. > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop -- Jim Ohlstein Professional Mailman Hosting https://mailman-hosting.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
