In article <75f5a58a-f53f-5222-9e3a-791f21594...@linuxmagic.com> you write: >>> "An unfolded header field has no length restriction and >>> therefore may be indeterminately long." >> >> You're right. I missed that. >> >> But I suspect I'm not the only one who missed it, so I would try to keep >> headers under 998 >> anyway. It usually isn't hard. >> > >Sure that isn't a typo in the RFC? Makes for more sense to say, a >'folded header field has no length restriction' eg, many lines long >long.. (Didn't read the context around it, just replying off the cuff)
The changes between RFC 2822 and 5322 were kept as small as possible, but that sentence was new. I'm pretty sure it means what it says. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
